New WHS rules and Code of Practice aim to prevent the impact of psychological harm at work

Freya Lucas

Aug 09, 2022

Save

The model work health and safety (WHS) laws now include regulations on psychosocial hazards, Safe Work Australia has shared, developed through Safe Work Australia’s tripartite process which includes Commonwealth, state and territory governments, and employer and worker representatives.

A model Code of Practice on Managing psychosocial hazards at work has been developed to explain the laws and how to comply with them, including practical steps to manage workplace risks to psychological health.

Employers of all types, including those in the early childhood education and care (ECEC) sector have an ongoing responsibility to do everything they reasonably can to prevent exposure to psychosocial hazards and risks, Safe Work Australia Chief Executive Officer Michelle Baxter explained.

Psychosocial hazards are anything at work that may cause psychological harm, and can aries from the way work is designed and managed, the working environment, or behaviours including bullying, harassment, discrimination, aggression and violence.

Work-related psychological injuries and illness have a significant negative impact on workers, their families and business. On average, work-related psychological injuries have longer recovery times, higher costs, and require more time away from work when compared with physical injuries.

“Workers’ compensation claims for psychological injury and illness have increased and impose high costs to employers through time off and workers’ compensation costs,” Ms Baxter said.

“Managing psychosocial risks protects workers, decreases staff turnover and absenteeism, and may improve broader organisational performance and productivity.”

The model Code of Practice: Managing psychosocial hazards at work is available on the Safe Work Australia website along with other materials including new model WHS Regulations to support employers to meet their WHS duties.

Don’t miss a thing

Childcare centres may have clear rules for staff numbers, but there are loopholes to get around them

There is a growing number of “serious incidents” in Australian early childhood services, including day cares.

What Can Australia Learn from Ontario’s Child Care Ratios?

As workforce pressures continue to shape early childhood education and care (ECEC) policy discussions in Australia, international comparisons provide useful perspectives. Canada’s approach, particularly in Ontario, offers a case study in how educator-to-child ratios, maximum group sizes and qualification requirements can be legislated as an integrated framework.

Burnout in early childhood education: Why leadership support is the missing lever

Early childhood educators have one of the most important jobs in Australia. We trust them to keep our kids safe, to educate them in their most formative years, and to care for them when we can’t do it ourselves. And far too often, educators are doing it all on empty.

Workforce planning in ECEC: from compliance requirement to strategic advantage

With workforce pressures continuing across early childhood education and care (ECEC), a structured approach to workforce planning is emerging as a critical leadership tool, not simply an administrative exercise.

National Early Childhood Worker Register: commencing 27 February 2026

The introduction of the National Early Childhood Worker Register from the 27 February, has signalled a significant shift in workforce oversight across early childhood education and care (ECEC).