Advocacy

Advocates come together to design ‘national standards’ and non negotiables for ECEC

Freya Lucas

Jun 03, 2021

Save

Advocacy organisations The Minderoo Foundation's Thrive by Five, Goodstart Early Learning, Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (ARACY) and Early Childhood Australia (ECA) have made submissions to the Review of the National Quality Framework (NQF) for early learning and school age care, asking for additional resources and funding to ensure high quality early learning for all Australian children.

Currently, the collective said, almost one in six early learning centres do not meet early learning quality standards, something that they believe “is just not good enough”.

The contributing organisations provided “very similar feedback” saying there should be “absolutely no diminution of the current national quality standards” and that any changes must not exacerbate the current workforce crisis for the sector.

Qualification requirements should remain as they are, they continued, and any regulatory changes resulting from the lobbied for changes “must not put additional pressure on already overworked educators and potentially increase the costs for parents. Educators need to focus on what really matters – children and their early years development.”

While Thrive by Five CEO Jay Weatherill welcomed the Federal Government’s significant investment in early learning as part of the Federal Budget, he said the work was merely a start, and a focus should be put on building a structure which would ensure a high-quality learning environment for future generations.

“Increasing the childcare subsidy and lowering the cost of childcare doesn’t directly address the need for quality standards improvement,” he explained.

“It might even mean added pressure for them instead. We know children have the best start in life through high quality early learning and childcare and educators and centre operators are calling for support for this essential service.”

“It’s important to get all sides of the debate so that we can end up with an early learning system that benefits all Australians." he added.

ECA CEO Samantha Page also advocated for the vital work of educators to be considered more deeply in the policy space moving forward, saying that “decades of research shows the importance of the early years”.

“Educators need to be valued and we must support them with better pay, training and the creation of a national workforce plan.”

“We need high quality standards in early childhood education and care services, and we need them to meet those standards. We hope that our submission will go some way to help with this.”

Goodstart CEO Julia Davison promoted the value of the existing NQF, something which she said has strong support both from Goodstart and the early childhood education and care (ECEC) sector more generally.

"We want to see the NQF continue to raise quality, but we also want to ensure that the early childhood workforce is supported to deliver that with an effective and well funded national workforce strategy," she added.

ARACY CEO Penny Dakin said that improving and refining regulatory frameworks would ultimately mean a better future for children.

“We strongly support strengthening alignment between the related regulatory frameworks that support the wellbeing of our youngest citizens – embedding a child safe organisational culture across our whole service system is essential. We also renew our call for a holistic early childhood strategy to support the wellbeing, learning, development and safety of all children in Australia,” she said.

As a collective, all organisations expressed their belief in:

Standards – there should be no diminution of the standards to make it easier for compliance. For example, qualification requirements should be maintained, and providing further exemptions to requirements does not address the longstanding workforce issues.
Costs – changes cannot be made that increase regulatory burden, and therefore increases staff worktime and subsequently drives up cost.
Workforce – no changes should be made that result in an increased workload for staff; and hence worsens the current crisis in the early childhood sector

And made collective recommendations to:

Amend the National ECEC Regulations and associated guidance to address the identified gap between the Child Safe Principles and the National Quality Standards
Modify National Quality Standards to better suit After School Hours Care.

For more information, please see here.

Don’t miss a thing

Male educators in early childhood: renewed debate highlights deeper workforce questions

A recent article published by Education Daily has reignited national discussion about the need for more male teachers across Australia. While much of the public commentary focuses on primary and secondary schooling, the gender imbalance is even more pronounced in early childhood education and care (ECEC).

Inclusion under the National Quality Framework: what it means for services

Inclusion is not an optional add-on in early childhood education and care (ECEC). It is embedded within the National Quality Framework (NQF) and underpins expectations about access, participation and equitable outcomes for all children.

Observations in the EYLF: why quality matters more than quantity

Questions about observations and documentation continue to surface across the early childhood education and care sector, particularly as educators navigate increasing workload pressures alongside expectations around planning, assessment and compliance.

Peppa Pig introduces deaf character in storyline focused on inclusion

The long-running children’s television series Peppa Pig has introduced a new storyline featuring a moderately deaf character, marking a notable moment in the program’s approach to representation and inclusion.

My hands, In plain sight

This article touches on child safety and abuse-related concerns in early childhood education and care. If these topics are difficult for you, please take care while reading and seek support if needed, contacts at the end.