UK childcare market watch: Government asks competition regulator to consider sector review

The UK childcare market is facing renewed scrutiny, with the UK Government formally asking the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to examine how the sector is functioning amid ongoing affordability, access and market sustainability concerns.
The CMA Chief Executive Sarah Cardell confirmed the regulator is developing a proposal for its Board to consider next month, following a request from the Secretary of State for Education, the Rt Hon Bridget Phillipson MP.
Ms Cardell said the CMA had already been monitoring developments in the childcare sector and that the Government’s request came at a point where independent advice and recommendations may be particularly useful.
The development does not yet represent the launch of a formal market study. However, it signals that the UK Government is considering whether deeper competition and market analysis is needed to inform future childcare policy settings.
Why the UK childcare market is attracting attention
The CMA typically examines markets where there are concerns about affordability, competition, transparency, consumer outcomes and the effectiveness of government policy settings.
Recent CMA work has focused on essential household markets such as fuel, infant formula, dentistry and veterinary services, areas where cost-of-living pressures, pricing practices and consumer protections have been prominent public concerns.
Childcare now appears to be moving further into that frame.
In her letter, Ms Cardell said the CMA is committed to promoting competition and protecting consumers in ways that support economic growth and household prosperity.
The UK Government is also progressing significant childcare policy reforms, including expanded entitlements and workforce-related measures. Any CMA work in this area could help inform how those reforms are designed and implemented.
The request also comes amid growing political scrutiny of ownership and profit in the English early years market, including concerns about the role of private equity and the extent to which public funding for privately owned nurseries is flowing through to profit rather than provision. While the CMA has not yet confirmed the scope of any work, those questions could sit alongside broader issues of affordability, transparency, supply, sustainability and access.
What a CMA review could examine
While the CMA has not yet confirmed the scope of any formal review, a childcare market study could potentially examine issues such as fee structures, price drivers, cost transparency, market concentration, the role of large provider groups, barriers to entry, the impact of public funding on supply and pricing, and regional differences in access and affordability.
A CMA market study can lead to recommendations to the government, proposed changes to provider practices, further investigation or, in some circumstances, enforcement action.
At this stage, the key development is the preparation of a Board proposal. If approved, the CMA would be expected to publish further details about the scope and terms of reference for any formal work.
An international policy watch point
For early years policy observers outside the UK, the development is noteworthy because it reflects a broader international trend: governments are increasingly examining how childcare markets operate when public funding, private provision, affordability, workforce pressures and family access intersect.
The UK development is less a direct Australian policy story and more an international market watch item for those tracking childcare reform, funding design and competition policy across comparable systems.
Why it matters for ECEC policy observers
The CMA’s letter makes clear that the regulator sees this as a timely moment to provide advice to the government.
Ms Cardell said the CMA is investing more in its role as an enabler of competition through advice and recommendations, particularly where government policy and spending shape markets to achieve important public policy objectives.
That framing is significant. It suggests any future review may look not only at provider behaviour, but also at the way policy settings, funding mechanisms and market design influence affordability, access and sustainability.
For the UK, this may mark the beginning of a deeper examination of how childcare is funded, delivered and regulated.
What happens next
The CMA will finalise a proposal for consideration by its Board.
If approved, the regulator would be expected to publish further details, including the scope of the work and any terms of reference, before commencing evidence gathering, consultation and analysis.
The UK Department for Education has offered access to government resources and expertise, indicating close engagement between policymakers and the competition regulator.
A market to watch
The UK childcare sector is now positioned as a market to watch for those interested in affordability, transparency, public funding and the role of competition policy in early childhood provision.
While no formal market study has yet been launched, the CMA’s next steps could provide important insight into how governments are thinking about childcare market design at a time when families, providers and policymakers are all under pressure.
Read the full CMA correspondence here.
















